After three days of debate and discussions in the House of Commons, in which Theresa May’s Brexit deal was overwhelmingly rejected and MPs showed their equal disdain for a no-deal exit, a majority of 210 MPs voted to try and delay Brexit and seek an extension to Article 50 from the EU.
A majority of Members of Parliament (MPs) in the UK’s lower house today voted to delay Brexit and seek an extension from the EU to conclude the process of the UK leaving the economic and political bloc.
The motion to seek an extension to Article 50 was approved by a majority of 210 MPs. It calls for Theresa May to seek an extension until June 30th 2019 if a deal is approved before March 20th. But the motion also acknowledges that a longer extension may need to be justified if the UK parliament cannot agree on the deal before the EU Council summit on March 21st.
Commons votes 412 to 202 to approve a motion to seek to extend the #Article50 period.
This extension will be until 30 June 2019 if the #BrexitDeal is approved by 20 March 2019.
It notes that if a deal is not approved, the length of the extension will depend on its purpose. pic.twitter.com/Noe08xFJsJ
— UK House of Commons (@HouseofCommons) March 14, 2019
The lower house also voted on several amendments. Theresa May survived an attempt in the Benn amendment for MPs to set the schedule for future debates and talks on Brexit, and wrestle control of the process from her hands, by a mere majority of two (312 ayes, 314 noes).
A perplexing majority of 229 MPs voted against holding a second referendum, an amendment supported by the breakaway Independent Group and the Liberal Democrats. Some Labour MPs wrote an open letter arguing why they were abstaining even though they support a second referendum “because it isn’t the right time.” They hope to be able to achieve a second referendum via other means in parliament.
While amendments are not legally binding, they offer a barometer of sentiment among MPs. The fact that 332 voted against a second referendum would constitute a majority even if Labour had voted, suggesting more than half of parliamentarians are not in favour of giving the British public a final say on Brexit.
Desires are nourished by delays?
Senior EU figures have expressed differing positions on granting an extension to Article 50, the clause in the Lisbon Treaty which envisages a two-year window for member states leaving the bloc to agree a framework for future cooperation with the Union.
Donald Tusk, president of the EU Council – the political body where ministers from the EU meet to agree policy – suggested he was open to granting the UK an extension.
— Donald Tusk (@eucopresident) March 14, 2019
But opposing views in the EU to delaying Brexit were made evident in a tweet by Guy Verhofstadt, the Brexit coordinator at the EU parliament, in which the Belgian MEP appeared to disagree with Tusk.
“Unless there is a clear majority in the House of Commons for something precise, there is no reason at all for the European Council to agree on a prolongation,” tweeted Verhofstadt.
Under no circumstances an extension in the dark! Unless there is a clear majority in the House of Commons for something precise, there is no reason at all for the European Council to agree on a prolongation. Even the motion tabled for this evening by the UK Gov. recognises this. https://t.co/BNJVVT7Klw
— Guy Verhofstadt (@guyverhofstadt) March 14, 2019
EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker has made clear he wants Brexit out of the way before European parliamentary elections in late May.
“I would like to stress that the United Kingdom’s withdrawal should be complete before the European elections that will take place between 23-26 May,” wrote Juncker in a letter to EU Council President Tusk on March 11th.
EU Brexit fatigue
The issue of an extension has also sewn divisions among member states, fracturing the united front the EU27 is keen to maintain. French President Emmanuel Macron said the Withdrawal Agreement could not be renegotiated but showed lukewarm signs that he was open to an extension.
Many EU leaders see an extension as justified only if the UK can present a viable plan as to how it will use the time to dig itself out of the Brexit quagmire.
“If the British need more time, we will examine a request for an extension — if it is justified by new choices on the part of the British,” said President Macron.
Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte echoed Macron’s thoughts.
Should the UK hand in a reasoned request for an extension, I expect a credible and convincing justification. The #EU27 will consider the request and decide by unanimity. The smooth functioning of the EU institutions needs to be ensured.
— Mark Rutte (@MinPres) March 12, 2019
Chief EU Negotiator Michel Barnier isn’t keen on an extension and feels his, and the EU’s work, has been done.
“Prolong this negotiation, to do what?” Barnier asked MEPs at the European Parliament’s plenary session in Strasbourg on the morning of Wednesday March 13th. “The negotiation on article 50 is over. We have a treaty. It is here,” he added.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, like EU Commission President Juncker, has previously suggested a 55 day extension to Article 50 until the beginning of EU parliamentary elections would be “very easy.” Any extension beyond May 22nd would mean the UK would have to hold EU parliamentary elections, Juncker has stated.
The final countdown
With the next EU Council summit a week away – March 21-22 – Theresa May and her negotiators now have a week to try and convince her European counterparts to grant an extension and avoid a cliff-edge no-deal exit on March 29th. The EU’s refusal to openly and unanimously content to an extension may just be posturing. Brexit has dragged on for nearly three years, yet as a former senior EU Commission official recently told me “twenty four hours is a long time in Brexit politics.”
Rights advocacy group British in Europe, formed in 2016 to defend the rights of UK nationals in the EU caught on the front lines of Brexit, repeated its call for the rights of 3.6 million EU nationals in the UK and 1.2 million UK nationals in the EU to be ring-fenced.
Should a long extension be discussed, please give consideration to the 5 million of us living in limbo who are currently facing a cliff edge. We cannnot live like this indefinitely, it is harming health, businesses, families. We need our rights ring fenced.#RescueOurRights https://t.co/1eQfjtiepA
— British in Europe (@BritishInEurope) March 14, 2019